> none of them compliant with GPL ideals That's totally fine with me and the beauty of restrictionless freedoms, you can do what you want. I license lots of my

> none of them compliant with GPL ideals That's totally fine with me and the beauty of restrictionless freedoms, you can do what you want. I license lots of my work that way, keep other parts hidden, etc. It's a healthy model instead of this rampant litigious approach often coupled with an irrational fear of theft. To be truly open sans restrictions is to take the bad with the good and recognize that what you open is not specifically where you make your money. Happily the industry continues to move towards unencumbered software especially on the language/runtime front.