> Every other release fails to compile on FreeBSD. But in later message you also state: > Our toolchain is actually GPL-free It's obviously the conflict of t

> Every other release fails to compile on FreeBSD. But in later message you also state: > Our toolchain is actually GPL-free It's obviously the conflict of the goals, where you, the way I understand it, can't complain that the GPL-based tools "don't always (in every release) perfectly (i.e. without any adjustments) work" on the platforms whose goal is to avoid the GPL. You should be lucky that they indeed fix the issues when somebody submits the patches. But the other communities can't expect from the GPL contributors to do the very work for which the said non-GPL communities exist. Or, in the words of my favourite Microsoft (i.e. non-GPL) developer: https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20110118-00 https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20110118-00 "Don’t just stand around saying somebody should do something: Be someone"