3 ms·
As a fair warning - Bohm interpretation (even though as fine as any other interpretation of quantum mechanics), is neither the most popular or the easist to fol
by stared 8y ago
As a fair warning - Bohm interpretation (even though as fine as any other interpretation of quantum mechanics), is neither the most popular or the easist to follow (don't be tempted).
(If you already know QM (as in: are able to perform calculations in QM, rather than "listened/read to however many hours of narration"), disregard this warning.)
In general, I strongly advise against starting from classical mechanics to understand quantum mechanics. While is the classical, and historic, way - it gives a lot of paradoxes and confusion.
Just start with a two-state system (ideally polarization of light, but spin-1/2, while harder and less intuitive, is still OK). Then only well after that (including 2-3 particles, entanglement, etc), and provided you learn Fourier transformation beforehand, move to position & momentum stuff.
See http://p.migdal.pl/2016/08/15/quantum-mechanics-for-high-school-students.html http://p.migdal.pl/2016/08/15/quantum-mechanics-for-high-sch... for my longer overview from my experience of teaching quantum mechanics to high-school students (and I link to the books & sources I find the best). And of course the Quantum Game with Photons: http://quantumgame.io/ http://quantumgame.io/