4 ms·
I don’t see how that’s relevant. We’re talking about long term subsidies and the often prevailing hope that this would enable new vocations and filling of under
by hycaria 8y ago
I don’t see how that’s relevant. We’re talking about long term subsidies and the often prevailing hope that this would enable new vocations and filling of underpayed but highly socially valuable functions (like family care etc)
I also happen to know many people through world of warcraft who live on their parents money, have no urge to win their own, simply live on little and have been playing for years now. They are not picking up new skills or doing something social.
I rather hope that someday money will be enough of a problem to motivate them to deal with their issues or just do something with their life, than keep things the same and hope for a change.
- mattmanser 8y agoAgain, you're focusing on the abnormal, rather than the normal, just like the parent. You come across these people because they spend a much larger amount of time than normal people. It's a basic consequence of simple stats that are very easy to misinterpret, and that's my point.