3 ms·
If California had investigated 100 of Anthem's paying customers' cancelled policies at random, instead of 90, and found 100 were illegally cancelled because of
by benologist 8y ago
If California had investigated 100 of Anthem's paying customers' cancelled policies at random, instead of 90, and found 100 were illegally cancelled because of the cost instead of the 90 out of 90 they found to be illegally cancelled because of the cost, would it be stealing then?
What is it if it's not stealing when you take people's money in exchange for a service but illegally close their account and keep the money they paid instead of providing the service?
In May 2014, Anthem Blue Cross refused to pay for the
hospitalization of a Sonoma County, California man for
stage four cancers, although he had paid Anthem over
$100,000.00 in premiums.[61][62] Anthem ended up paying
for coverage following public outcry.[63].
- jaredklewis 8y agoYou are making the following argument: 1. Anthem Insurance stole from policy holders. 2. Ergo, Zurich Insurance stole from Mondelez. If you are going to make a claim that all insurers are systematically stealing from their customers, I think you are a long way off. So Toyota sometimes ships cars with bad breaks. Ergo all car companies are trying to kill drivers?
- benologist 8y agoAre health insurance companies abnormal or representative of non-health insurance companies? Zurich Insurance doesn't look better at all based on the submitted article - specifically covered “all risks of physical loss or damage” and “all risk of physical loss or damage to electronic data, programs or software” due to “the malicious introduction of a machine code or instruction.”