4 ms·
Sorry, that was the wrong ankylosing spndylitis reference. The last link, like the first, I passed on because it is full of references to primary articles. In
by WalterSear 8y ago
Sorry, that was the wrong ankylosing spndylitis reference. The last link, like the first, I passed on because it is full of references to primary articles.
In any case, you don't seem to have the background in rheumatic diseases to evaluate any of this, and I don't have the time to pass on the knowledge I've garnered, as a sufferer, and also a life sciences engineer working on autoimmune and genetic engineering problems. Consequently this has already devolved into a Joe Rogan-style internet argument.
If this stuff is important to you,keep watching the news, there's a lot of good research that's going to reach outside academia in the next couple of years, regarding hyper/hypothermia, heat shock proteins, and autoimmune and mood disorders.
- arkades 8y agoYour first and last links didn't have references to primary articles of clinical assessments. Your third article was more of the same. Your second article was just funny because it pointed to the opposite therapy. > as a sufferer, and also a life sciences engineer working on autoimmune and genetic engineering problems. I wish you could join me in the irony of being a physician with an autoimmune disease being told "you don't seem to have the background" to evaluate your citations.
- WalterSear 8y agoThat is ironic. Unfortunately, according to my oncologist friends, it's also commonplace. You reviewed what I posted with an aim to proving me wrong, not expanding your knowledge, and then prove me wrong. Kind of a terribly attitude in a physician, and really self-destructive to those dealing with autoimmune disease.
- joveian 8y ago"You reviewed what I posted with an aim to proving me wrong" As an uninvolved reader I had the opposite impression.