4 ms·

I don't think simplístic means what you think it does. Go isn't simplistic. It might be seen as simple but it isn't so simple that it loses utility. There's pl

I don't think simplístic means what you think it does. Go isn't simplistic. It might be seen as simple but it isn't so simple that it loses utility. There's plenty of nuance and elegance in there to solve real problems. A simplistic version of go would have a bunch of wizards and a giant code generator that runs after you click Next enough times.

josteink 8y ago
> A simplistic version of go would have a bunch of wizards and a giant code generator that runs after you click Next enough times. You mean like Go and how people compensate for lack of generics? Generating code? That kind of simplistic?
- apta 8y ago
  > You mean like Go and how people compensate for lack of generics? Generating code? Not to mention how mocks for unit tests are generated. Golang is a step back from Java and .NET