I'm not sure why this is the way that it is, but it's emblematic of human nature. Information isn't always composed of raw facts. There's a presentation layer t

I'm not sure why this is the way that it is, but it's emblematic of human nature. Information isn't always composed of raw facts. There's a presentation layer that sits on top and is needed for humans to parse and process that information. i.e. You can present the same facts with a new interpretation, making it essentially new information. I'm not sure this isn't a feature, as opposed to a bug, of human thinking.