4 ms·
Yea, I thought that too. I imagine either the "or warlike" part or additional text that was not quoted narrows it down to state actors or state-like actors (e.g
by ascar 8y ago
Yea, I thought that too. I imagine either the "or warlike" part or additional text that was not quoted narrows it down to state actors or state-like actors (e.g. terror groups like ISIS or al-Qaida). Would still be a very broad definition.
- mannykannot 8y agoI have no idea how the law would interpret it, but while 'hostile warlike act' might narrow the scope as you suggest, 'hostile or warlike act' would seem to widen the scope to any hostile act, warlike or not. (Are there any non-hostile warlike acts? Accidents such as so-called 'friendly fire' incidents might fit...)