https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/10/171005111100.htm https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/10/171005111100.h... Fingerprints lack scientific bas

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/10/171005111100.htm https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/10/171005111100.h... Fingerprints lack scientific basis for legal certainty More research into validity of fingerprint comparisons needed Date: October 5, 2017 Source: Carnegie Mellon University Summary: A new report on the quality of latent fingerprint analysis says that courtroom testimony and reports stating or even implying that fingerprints collected from a crime scene belong to a single person are indefensible and lack scientific foundation. http://theconversation.com/fingerprinting-to-solve-crimes-not-as-robust-as-you-think-85534 http://theconversation.com/fingerprinting-to-solve-crimes-no... Fingerprinting to solve crimes: not as robust as you think https://californiainnocenceproject.org/issues-we-face/fingerprint-analysis/ https://californiainnocenceproject.org/issues-we-face/finger... The main problem with fingerprint analysis is one consistent with many other areas of forensic science: subjectivity. Instead of relying on tested scientific methods, the process is mostly based on the subjective beliefs of the analyst... Despite this subjectivity, fingerprint analysts also typically testify in terms of absolute certainty. https://issues.org/mnookin/ https://issues.org/mnookin/ Fingerprints: Not a Gold Standard So to answer your question: Should law enforcement be prohibited from fingerprinting objects found at crime scenes? You tell me.