2 ms·
It's not about the cost, it's about the benefit. The author is arguing that the proposals for what to do with a super-LHC aren't very good and that's why it sho
by mabbo 8y ago
It's not about the cost, it's about the benefit. The author is arguing that the proposals for what to do with a super-LHC aren't very good and that's why it shouldn't be done.
So let's indeed spend the $20B- but spend it on 20 other $1B programs that will each provide better results and answers than what we'll get from poor theories that a $20B project can answer.