3 ms·
suppose for a moment that this Tobuscus guy was indeed unfairly maligned — i don’t know, but hey, could be. that in no way contradicts the parent commenter’s po
by allenbrunson 8y ago
suppose for a moment that this Tobuscus guy was indeed unfairly maligned — i don’t know, but hey, could be. that in no way contradicts the parent commenter’s point, which is this: all the hand-wringing over the celebrities whose careers were destroyed over “just an accusation” is wrong, because it was never just that one accusation.
rosanne barr is a good example. the author of the article goes into minute detail over the tweet that ended her show, yet somehow doesn’t have a word to say about the decades of her bad behavior that preceeded it.
- maceurt 8y agoNo. Tobuscus was a basic celebrity (youtube channel with over a million subscribers, one of the biggest in his prime), and was a reputable person with no real bad history. He was ruined by one accusation. Furthermore, most people are not perfect. You can find a bad history for anyone i.e. James Gunn. That does not make an accusation destroying someone's career okay. > Suppose for a moment that this Tobuscus guy was indeed unfairly maligned — i don’t know, but hey, could be. That is why false rape accusations are so bad. You have to preface this by saying you don't know if he is a rapist or not, when there is physical evidence that proves he didn't, but the accusation is more important than the evidence.