2 ms·
Okay, then explain Tobuscus. Look him up. He lost arguably over a million dollars in deals with companies and with his publisher not to mention he stopped putti
by maceurt 8y ago
Okay, then explain Tobuscus. Look him up. He lost arguably over a million dollars in deals with companies and with his publisher not to mention he stopped putting out videos because of the whole ordeal. The only bad history he had before was that had a drug addiction and he was "manipulative". However all his past girlfriends backed him up, and their was conclusive evidence that the accusation was false. Still, his life was pretty much wrecked.
- allenbrunson 8y agosuppose for a moment that this Tobuscus guy was indeed unfairly maligned — i don’t know, but hey, could be. that in no way contradicts the parent commenter’s point, which is this: all the hand-wringing over the celebrities whose careers were destroyed over “just an accusation” is wrong, because it was never just that one accusation. rosanne barr is a good example. the author of the article goes into minute detail over the tweet that ended her show, yet somehow doesn’t have a word to say about the decades of her bad behavior that preceeded it.
- maceurt 8y agoNo. Tobuscus was a basic celebrity (youtube channel with over a million subscribers, one of the biggest in his prime), and was a reputable person with no real bad history. He was ruined by one accusation. Furthermore, most people are not perfect. You can find a bad history for anyone i.e. James Gunn. That does not make an accusation destroying someone's career okay. > Suppose for a moment that this Tobuscus guy was indeed unfairly maligned — i don’t know, but hey, could be. That is why false rape accusations are so bad. You have to preface this by saying you don't know if he is a rapist or not, when there is physical evidence that proves he didn't, but the accusation is more important than the evidence.