3 ms·
They don't need to explicitly save and store a history of every voice command to do voice recognition.
by beezischillin 8y ago
They don't need to explicitly save and store a history of every voice command to do voice recognition.
- DennisAleynikov 8y agothere might be implementations that don't do this for instance Siri or Bixby but that doesn't mean Googles approach is wrong. It can be unacceptable for your privacy and security threat model but for most it makes 0 difference wether the training continuously happens in the cloud or locally on the NPU inside your phone. Saving all the clips as much as people love to fear monger it is literally the strategy that objectively leads to the highest quality implementation on the market. Googles Assistant by far understands language most naturally and we owe that to all the free vocal training data google diligently uses.
- quickben 8y ago"but for most it makes 0 difference wether the training continuously happens in the cloud or locally on the NPU inside your phone." Sadly, nobody will ever know if this is true as the choice doesn't exist.
- DennisAleynikov 8y agothe choice does exist, Apple iPhone does everything privacy first, Android does things cost savings first (aka the cloud) Most people seem to like the Google Assistant for more natural interactions and only tolerate siri for her limited uses she can do.