I think it's fine. In the second line it says > A major reason we see so many wrong predictions in the foundations of physics – and see those make headlines –

I think it's fine. In the second line it says > A major reason we see so many wrong predictions in the foundations of physics – and see those make headlines – is that both scientists and science writers take falsifiability to be a sufficient criterion for good science. Personally the line that caught my eye straight away was the one on it's own that said > Why does it matter? after which comes the stuff about bigger accelerators.