Only one publication passes the Gell-Mann test for me, and I pay for it. Nothing else comes close. Definitely not NYT. Just yesterday I came across an article i

Only one publication passes the Gell-Mann test for me, and I pay for it. Nothing else comes close. Definitely not NYT. Just yesterday I came across an article in NYT that was hilariously wrong. I've spent all my working hours in the past year and a half on it, whereas the journalist spent maybe a couple of hours on it. They drew the most outlandish conclusions from the snippet of data they looked at. Very disappointing because it erodes the trust I have in that publication. If they could be so wrong about something I know about, what's the guarantee they're right about anything else?