3 ms·
They're not employees but 1099 workers sure sound like they're part of your 'Enterprise'. They could even be 'in house'. Lots of 1099s actually work in the sam
by zethraeus 8y ago
They're not employees but 1099 workers sure sound like they're part of your 'Enterprise'. They could even be 'in house'.
Lots of 1099s actually work in the same building as employees. What makes you think they wouldn't be covered?
- united893 8y agoSure, fair point. But Facebook paid as well. If Facebook starts paying them via 1099, would that be fair?
- zethraeus 8y agoAssuming Apple doesn't explicitly ban analytics collection (and how would that play with fancy mdm solutions?), it sure sounds like it should!
- kccqzy 8y agoGenerally if someone earned less than $600 as an independent contractor, the payer does not have to send the contractor a 1099-MISC. Given that Facebook pays $20 per month, it's well below the limit for issuing 1099s.
- wheelerwj 8y agoeveryone in the US who is not employed directly (where the employer pays income tax for you) are by default 10-99s if they are paid more than $600 per year... how the people are paid has nothing to do with why Apple took the action they did.