>"It's not clear that even reputed newspapers like NYTimes/WaPo produce quality content consistently." Doesn't the Washington post charge for articles with nam

>"It's not clear that even reputed newspapers like NYTimes/WaPo produce quality content consistently." Doesn't the Washington post charge for articles with named sources? Almost every time I follow a link to them the source has been "someone familiar with the matter". However, one time I was surprised see there were actual names attached to the quotes, but they obscured most of the page and wanted me to pay a dollar to read it.