4 ms·
Something like that, but with more cores and cheaper. It looks like there are up to 64 cores in Xeon Phi at 1.5Ghz (price > $1000). A Nvidia 1030 is still bet
by antoineMoPa 8y ago
Something like that, but with more cores and cheaper.
It looks like there are up to 64 cores in Xeon Phi at 1.5Ghz (price > $1000). A Nvidia 1030 is still better with more than 300 cuda cores at 1.4GHz (price ~= $150). Not that I think that cuda cores and Xeon Phi cores can be compared, but 64 is not that much at that price... What we'd need is dumber cores in very high number. We don't need all fancy things that normal CPU cores have, like virtualization.
- jcranmer 8y agoNote that Nvidia's core counts are misleading. To apply Nvidia's logic to Xeon Phi, a 64-core Xeon Phi is really 512 cuda cores--each SIMD lane is counted as an independent "Cuda core".
- boulos 8y ago1024 (64 x 16-wide float32).
- antoineMoPa 8y agoGood point, I did not know what SIMD was. (Very interesting side projects to come...)
- wtallis 8y agoI wish we could talk about GPUs and similar architectures in terms of their total FPU width—how many 32b or 64b floating point operations can be done per clock— and as a secondary measure the number of independent instruction streams that can be worked on in parallel. One provides a upper bound on the arithmetic power of the chip and the other predicts how easy it will be to get close to full utilization of those compute resources. Distilling an architecture down to just one core count only guarantees that you can't compare it against dissimilar architectures.
- DecentShoes 8y agoThe Larrabee architecture was something like this, no?
- phonon 8y agohttps://www.rs-online.com/designspark/hands-on-with-a-144-core-processor https://www.rs-online.com/designspark/hands-on-with-a-144-co...