3 ms·
So you assert that an atheist can find meaning by following their subjective values and morality, correct? This seems entirely circular and equivalent to saying
by dpark 8y ago
So you assert that an atheist can find meaning by following their subjective values and morality, correct? This seems entirely circular and equivalent to saying that atheists can find meaning by valuing the things that they value.
How does an atheist hold subjective morals and values without those morals and values essentially being arbitrary?
- mfoy_ 8y agoWhat's wrong with them being arbitrary?
- dpark 8y agoIn what way are arbitrary values meaningful?
- mfoy_ 8y agoDefine "meaningful". You seem to have a really big chicken-and-egg problem here... you want morality to be universal. The problem is, "ethics", "morality", and "values" are all human constructs. We created them, we define them, we discuss them ad nauseum. They are as varied as we are. I don't think that makes them "meaningless".
- dpark 8y agoI don’t have a chicken and egg problem. The chicken and egg problem arises from an attempt to pull meaning out of an arbitrary universe. You say in different words that things are meaningful only because we believe they are. That’s fine if it helps you but it’s also circular and rather solipsistic. Your stance is also literally nihilistic: “a doctrine that denies any objective ground of truth and especially of moral truth”.
- mfoy_ 8y agoSee: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19048897 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19048897