Please explain which part of this timeline is where Facebook was innocent: - 1. Facebook publishes app that steals user data to App Store, disguised as a VPN an

Please explain which part of this timeline is where Facebook was innocent: - 1. Facebook publishes app that steals user data to App Store, disguised as a VPN and it gets removed because it violates the terms & conditions that Facebook agreed to - 2. Facebook publishes similar enough shady app through program meant for enterprise app deployment, violating another rule on top of violating the previous set of rules again, also they access children's data - 3. get punished, rule-violating enterprise app distribution channel gets suspended Thought experiment: If you published an app to Microsoft's Xbox One store which spies on users' out of app habits and therefore breaks the rules and got removed, then proceeded to send everyone jailbreak kits for xboxes and trying to incentivise them to use the app that way and got punished for it, would you feel that Microsoft has it out for you?