That's a very interesting thought process! Thank you for bringing it forth. Might there be an easier answer? Perhaps the West was using a risk-based approach t

That's a very interesting thought process! Thank you for bringing it forth. Might there be an easier answer? Perhaps the West was using a risk-based approach to security, where a missile built with aging technology just isn't as dangerous if stole as a current one. I'm sure it's just my naive reading, but this seems like it would produce a functionally identical outcome without requiring a tinfoil hat or deliberate staking of bait for an adversary.