3 ms·
Edit: I was looking at a corrected article. Ignore this post. I don't know a whole lot about this, but I do know that if you write something to show that you
by treis 8y ago
Edit: I was looking at a corrected article. Ignore this post.
I don't know a whole lot about this, but I do know that if you write something to show that you were misrepresented in an article you need to be extremely careful to not misrepresent the article.
He says:
>The article wrongly states that in 2015 my colleagues I argued that the population of Europe was “almost entirely” replaced by people from the Eastern Europe Steppe
When the article says:
>Almost entirely replaced existing commmunities [snip] in Central and Northern Europe.
- b1gnasty 8y ago" Correction: Jan. 25, 2019 An earlier version of this article misstated the number of peer reviewers who evaluated the 2016 Nature paper “Genomic Insights Into the Peopling of the Southwest Pacific” before publication. It was four, not three; a fourth reviewer was added to evaluate the paper after the original submission was revised. The article also misstated the geographical area where migrants from the steppes of eastern Ukraine and southern Russia significantly replaced existing communities of hunter-gatherers and early farmers, as reported in an academic paper on the migration. It was Central and Northern Europe, not the entire continent. "
- treis 8y agoWhoops! Fooled by the edit