4 ms·

This[0] is from the organisation that got the files unsealed, and includes the "whale" reference at the beginning of the chat mentioned. Not sure it proves that

This[0] is from the organisation that got the files unsealed, and includes the "whale" reference at the beginning of the chat mentioned. Not sure it proves that 5-year-old were referred to in this way, but it does sound very casual in it's usage. [0] - https://www.revealnews.org/blog/a-judge-unsealed-a-trove-of-internal-facebook-documents-following-our-legal-action/ https://www.revealnews.org/blog/a-judge-unsealed-a-trove-of-...

nailer 8y ago
Relevant part: > Gillian: Would you refund this whale ticket? User is disputing ALL charges… > Michael: What’s the users total lifetime spend? > Gillian: It’s $6,545 – but card was just added on Sept. 2. They are disputing all of it I believe. That user looks underage as well. Well, maybe not under 13. > Michael: Is the user writing in a parent, or is this user a 13ish year old > Gillian: It’s a 13ish yr old. says its 15. looks a bit younger. she* not its. Lol. > Michael: … I wouldn’t refund > Gillian: Oh that’s fine. cool. agreed. just double checking Clickbait headline makes it sound like they were trying to recruit whales.
- gerardnll 8y ago
  Oh great. What a moral. 'oh that's fine. cool. agreed. just double checking'. Thanks god he's not a judge. These guys side Facebook versus a 13 year old kid, nice morality.
  - nailer 8y ago
    Is "these guys" supposed to be me? I'm not 'siding' Facebook. I think they should have forgiven the debt. That you think a clearly misleading headline is a matter of 'sides' is worrying.
    - gerardnll 8y ago
      These guys => 2 guys in your transcribed conversation. I'm talking about the conversation. What's worrying is a person deciding to not refund a 13-15 year old kid that I'm pretty sure doesn't know how many money has spent on games.
      - nailer 8y ago
        Fair enough. They’re Facebook employees - them "siding with" their own company doesn't quite seem like the right way to describe this - but I'm glad you're not talking about me and thanks for the clarification.

nailer 8y ago

Relevant part: > Gillian: Would you refund this whale ticket? User is disputing ALL charges… > Michael: What’s the users total lifetime spend? > Gillian: It’s $6,545 – but card was just added on Sept. 2. They are disputing all of it I believe. That user looks underage as well. Well, maybe not under 13. > Michael: Is the user writing in a parent, or is this user a 13ish year old > Gillian: It’s a 13ish yr old. says its 15. looks a bit younger. she* not its. Lol. > Michael: … I wouldn’t refund > Gillian: Oh that’s fine. cool. agreed. just double checking Clickbait headline makes it sound like they were trying to recruit whales.

gerardnll 8y ago
Oh great. What a moral. 'oh that's fine. cool. agreed. just double checking'. Thanks god he's not a judge. These guys side Facebook versus a 13 year old kid, nice morality.
- nailer 8y ago
  Is "these guys" supposed to be me? I'm not 'siding' Facebook. I think they should have forgiven the debt. That you think a clearly misleading headline is a matter of 'sides' is worrying.
  - gerardnll 8y ago
    These guys => 2 guys in your transcribed conversation. I'm talking about the conversation. What's worrying is a person deciding to not refund a 13-15 year old kid that I'm pretty sure doesn't know how many money has spent on games.
    - nailer 8y ago
      Fair enough. They’re Facebook employees - them "siding with" their own company doesn't quite seem like the right way to describe this - but I'm glad you're not talking about me and thanks for the clarification.