If we're going by the capitalist definition of success where "more money = better than" (a reasonable assumption given Paul's occupation) then his essay doesn't

If we're going by the capitalist definition of success where "more money = better than" (a reasonable assumption given Paul's occupation) then his essay doesn't pass the laugh test. https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/study-rich-more-likely-to-take-candy-from-babies/2011/08/25/gIQAXE0beR_blog.html https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/study-r... >The “upper class,” as defined by the study, were more likely to break the law while driving, take candy from children, lie in negotiation, cheat to increase their odds of winning a prize and endorse unethical behavior at work, researchers reported today in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.