You implied "every case" when not addressing the list of web apps, while also rejecting my premise that there is a distinction between "websites" and "web apps"

You implied "every case" when not addressing the list of web apps, while also rejecting my premise that there is a distinction between "websites" and "web apps" by stating: > Webapps can be implemented just fine without Javascript; I’ve been doing it for years. You never addressed any of the examples, so I don't see why it's wrong to assume you believe that the listed applications can be implemented, in the browser, without JavaScript. You flat out rejected the idea. > How do you think webapps were written before React came along? Jquery / Prototype / ExtJS, and others where written in Flash or Java. I think it's fine to want parts of the internet to work without JavaScript or having any programming language involved. I highly suggest you checkout IPLD[0]. I've always thought that having a graph browser, much like the original intent of www may of been when Tim Berners-Lee wrote the original web browser. It would be fascinating if the entire internet functioned as workers extending the graph that is the internet. Web applications adding to the graph, while web browser, walked through it. There is a lot to be imagined. I think there is room for both applications and data to exists together. [0] https://ipld.io/ https://ipld.io/