3 ms·
This post is pretty weak. Neither metmorphblog nor the lawblog explain what this rule means. They both declare it as bad. But why? So what if 'accredited inves
by raheemm 16y ago
This post is pretty weak. Neither metmorphblog nor the lawblog explain what this rule means. They both declare it as bad. But why?
So what if 'accredited investor threshold' is raised? Will angels not get to make investments? Will they have to pay higher taxes? What is the intent behind raising this threshold? Will it stop someone from starting a ponzi scheme?
- MediaSquirrel 16y agoActually, the proposed change to rule is not clearly stated. Simply, there is an unspecified change to the rules on the agenda. "§413: Propose rules to revise the “accredited investor” standard" http://www.sec.gov/spotlight/dodd-frank/dfactivity-upcoming.shtml#01-03-11 http://www.sec.gov/spotlight/dodd-frank/dfactivity-upcoming....