3 ms·
" no comparable anti-intellectual streak in the American left as there is in the right" Wow. Intersectionalism, as it is applied popularly, is a massively 'an
by sonnyblarney 8y ago
" no comparable anti-intellectual streak in the American left as there is in the right"
Wow.
Intersectionalism, as it is applied popularly, is a massively 'anti intellectual' exercise.
Authoritarianism, controlling speech, banning speakers etc. at campuses all across the US is largely driven by a specific group of leftists.
Those actions are quite fundamentally 'anti intellectual' and 'anti liberal' to the point wherein it has quite a number of people in those communities afraid to speak out.
This has spread from academia into other institutions such as government and media and has significant impact upon us all.
I'm not taking sides, other than to point out that there's some roughshod everywhere you look, it just takes different forms. The hard part is most people might not want to have the self awareness to consider that some actions may be corrupt, i.e. banning 'Jordan Peterson' from speaking may be considered a moral act by some, hence, they see nothing wrong on 'their side' only 'the other'.
- RandomTisk 8y agoYou'll notice that only stories that make some Republican look bad stay on the front page for very long. The American left isn't so much anti-intellectual as they are anti-inconvenient-facts, although the end result is largely the same.
- sonnyblarney 8y agoBoth sides ignore 'inconvenient facts'. Neither side seems to be willing to admit it. And framed using certain language i.e. 'anti-intellectualism' then one side can frame themselves as less ignorant than the other, even if it's not true.