> When they see the actual engineers' answers of "NO" on the traceability report, then NASA would have stopped right there as a blocker and push hard. This is

> When they see the actual engineers' answers of "NO" on the traceability report, then NASA would have stopped right there as a blocker and push hard. This is completely unsupported by the extensive investigation and reports of the catastrophe. NASA simply would not accept NO, and all evidence available says they would have found a way to justify ignoring any weather + seals evidence that would have stopped the launch.