You're correct, factually; this is just a perverse way of 'campaigning' that has no semblance to the 'spirit of democracy', rather than the criminal sort of vot

You're correct, factually; this is just a perverse way of 'campaigning' that has no semblance to the 'spirit of democracy', rather than the criminal sort of voter suppression, but that's the age we live in. Hah. Imagine if all this effort had been turned towards anything _good_, like, say, electing a political party in Trinidad which supported the interests of both racial groups instead of suppressing one of them from voting so the other would win. Like, what if all this scheming was in the interest of helping do good things that help people instead of electing the powerful people who pay for it? Sure sounds nice.