3 ms·
The author's name is on the proposal, Craig Hockenberry. To avoid making folks Google for him, he's been running the Iconfactory, a design and programming consu
by chipotle_coyote 8y ago
The author's name is on the proposal, Craig Hockenberry. To avoid making folks Google for him, he's been running the Iconfactory, a design and programming consultancy that does, yes, icons, as well as web sites and applications. They're most famous for Twitterrific, the very first Twitter client (and the one that gave us the word "tweet" for Twitter posts as well as the blue bird icon). They've been in business over twenty years. Hockenberry is himself both an app developer and a long-time web developer.
I'm not sure I particularly agree with this proposal, either, for a lot of reasons outlined in comments here (most broadly that this is putting too much of a burden on users, and that it's just likely to create a new round of cat-and-mouse games with bad actors to find ways around it), but the author certainly isn't inexperienced in web and application matters.
- ghiculescu 8y agoAlso worth noting that he just launched a competing ad network: https://blog.iconfactory.com/2019/01/advertising-with-ollie/ https://blog.iconfactory.com/2019/01/advertising-with-ollie/
- chipotle_coyote 8y agoAs near as I can tell the Twitterrific ad network literally only serves in-app ads to users of Twitterrific.
- yuchi 8y agoExactly what I feared. It looked suspiciously too well written to be from someone not versed on the topic. I stand on my opinion: this proposal is antithetical to the web itself. (Doesn’t change the fact that I’ve always admired all their work, now that I know who is he)