4 ms·
I wonder if the $20 payment was so that Facebook could plausibly claim they _were_ distributing internal apps to employees? I'm sure "employees" is defined loo
by philipodonnell 8y ago
I wonder if the $20 payment was so that Facebook could plausibly claim they _were_ distributing internal apps to employees?
I'm sure "employees" is defined loosely enough in the agreement to include "contractors", and the bar there is pretty low, getting paid pretty much makes you a contractor.
- bashinator 8y agoMinors generally not legally able to be held to a contract.
- r00fus 8y agoI'd bet if you look at their internal FIN system these "employees" weren't listed as 1099 vendors.