I may be confused with regard to the purpose of your response, then. Those of us who can't write more than a handful of posts in a day have to put a lot of wor

I may be confused with regard to the purpose of your response, then. Those of us who can't write more than a handful of posts in a day have to put a lot of words in them, and maybe some thought, because if there is an exchange with multiple posts in it, the system cuts us off for a few hours. I know you don't have that problem. I remind you that we can't all write 15-word posts that state that there may be a problem with the conversation, but without offering any specifics, or any hints on how to fix it. Should my response have been in reply to the linked post instead of to yours? Should I have written fewer words or more words? Why is the word count relevant? Was your response in support of the linked poster, against, or neutral? Do you believe that your post added enough to the conversation that my reply should have addressed it specifically, rather than the content of the post it referenced? I understand that there is a complaint, but I don't know why. I could have been more brief, but I didn't have enough of my own time to waste less of yours. Sorry for that.