> if implemented correctly, maybe, but that rarely happens. It's OT, but isn't it funny that we think that by applying in the exactly correct way a method that

> if implemented correctly, maybe, but that rarely happens. It's OT, but isn't it funny that we think that by applying in the exactly correct way a method that, to my knowledge, wasn't born from fundamental principles or hard science, you should get all the results you don't get when taking some liberties with it? I mean, where does the assurance that the method works better than any variation of it come from?