3 ms·
How does it compares to ClickHouse ? Isnt creating a proprietary Query Language going to be a problem for Adhoc quries? Why create yet another language when the
by subhajeet2107 8y ago
How does it compares to ClickHouse ? Isnt creating a proprietary Query Language going to be a problem for Adhoc quries? Why create yet another language when the industry is standardizing on SQL or a subset of SQL
- jamesblonde 8y agoClickHouse is interesting - it's also an apache project. I am suprised Uber didn't build AresDB on it. The stigma, unfortunately, of coming from Russia makes it hard for the project to gain mindshare in the Valley.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- peferron 8y agoClickHouse is licensed under the Apache License 2.0, but isn't an "Apache project" as in an ASF project. Maybe that's what you meant—just want to make that clear for other readers. ClickHouse scan performance is through the roof, but it also seems fairly difficult to operate compared to the alternatives. For example, the concept of "deep storage" in Druid and Pinot makes rebalancing and replication trivial (at the expense of additional storage space). ClickHouse doesn't have that and requires more babysitting. And that's without even going into something like BigQuery, which is on a completely different level regarding operational simplicity if your use cases support it. Also, if queries are heavily filtered by arbitrary dimensions, then ClickHouse starts to lose its edge compared to fully-indexed systems. This makes ClickHouse fairly niche IMO, despite being exceptional at what it does.
- youngtaff 8y agoAFAIK CloudFlare run it for their analytics platform so it'd be interesting to see why it works for them
- jgrahamc 8y agoYes we do. We moved our entire analytics backend to ClickHouse some time ago. It works well for us: https://blog.cloudflare.com/http-analytics-for-6m-requests-per-second-using-clickhouse/ https://blog.cloudflare.com/http-analytics-for-6m-requests-p...
- bithavoc 8y agoWhat Clickhouse engines does CF uses?