The argument he makes is the standard absence-of-transitional-forms argument Yes, that's in there, actually. which is pretty high on any list of “usual debunk

The argument he makes is the standard absence-of-transitional-forms argument Yes, that's in there, actually. which is pretty high on any list of “usual debunked tropes” of the dishonest creationist crowd I only skimmed the article, so mea culpa. (There's value for the side of truth if the best effort of the opposition so easily, functionally falls into a usual debunked trope.) However, I don't think people like that are all dishonest. I think a lot of them have some kind of mental block. I'm reminded of when I've taught coding and when I've taught music. Some people can't distinguish fine degrees of pitch difference, and those are the same people who can't distinguish little differences in rhythmic placement. (Some scientists have actually studied these "amusical" people.) Some people simply can't grasp the values of variables changing over iterations. Others may have an axe to grind. to the point where even at least one creationist has debunked it. That sounds interesting.