If the great majority of the article presents legitimate issues or gaps in the theory, I don't think the entire article can be dismissed as "anything but ideolo

If the great majority of the article presents legitimate issues or gaps in the theory, I don't think the entire article can be dismissed as "anything but ideological" regardless of whether it presents a satisfying alternate theory in the last few paragraphs. I think that conclusion would be more fitting if the examples presented are not legitimate in some way -- perhaps already explained or debunked in other literature or simply incorrect in certain details.