3 ms·
Some healthy skepticism is definitely required here, but I think the title of the MJ article was a little misleading. This publication looks more like NYRB or
by natechols 8y ago
Some healthy skepticism is definitely required here, but I think the title of the MJ article was a little misleading. This publication looks more like NYRB or a similar high-brow literary magazine - far from what I think of when I see the phrase "science journal". Could still be nonsense and propaganda, but at least it's not pretending to be peer-reviewed original research.