"Let’s examine the evidence. At its peak the planet’s fourth most valuable company, and arguably its most influential, is controlled almost entirely by a young

"Let’s examine the evidence. At its peak the planet’s fourth most valuable company, and arguably its most influential, is controlled almost entirely by a young man with the charisma of a geometry T.A." Is Zuck's personality really worth attacking up front in this piece? Can't he be an awkward nerd that found success? That's not to excuse any misbehavior on FB's part but attacking his lack of charisma seems pointless and petty. "The most stirring parts of the book are those in which McNamee makes the angry but measured argument that “social media has enabled personal views that had previously been kept in check by social pressure.”" This article literally starts off saying that we're living in 1984 due to Facebook and ends lamenting that people are allowed to voice their own opinions on the platform. I can't imagine a further disconnect.