3 ms·
I don't think that works. I think most of us here would have similar understandings of something like https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/19941/example-of-s
by throwaway5752 8y ago
I don't think that works. I think most of us here would have similar understandings of something like https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/19941/example-of-system-architecture-picture-in-tikz https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/19941/example-of-sys..., similar to what physicists might have from a Feynman diagram. I assume physicists could illustrate a proof with one, but would actually run through the QED equations, also. Similarly, we could deeply understand a system from an architectural diagram, but we wouldn't use them as source code.
- wires 8y agonow you can. ok, well soon :) but the theory is in place and works. Also stochastic Petri nets are actually equivalent to Feynman diagrams in a precise sense (https://johncarlosbaez.wordpress.com/2012/12/20/petri-net-programming-part-2/ https://johncarlosbaez.wordpress.com/2012/12/20/petri-net-pr...), they could be the Feynman diagrams of functional programming :)