3 ms·
You haven't explained why it is that journalists can't work without newspapers, when newspapers aren't needed to reach readers anymore.
by ajuc 8y ago
You haven't explained why it is that journalists can't work without newspapers, when newspapers aren't needed to reach readers anymore.
- pvg 8y agoI think you haven't explained how and why it is reporters don't need editors, photographers, lawyers, stringers, publishers, regular paycheques, bookers, interpreters, etc. You just declared those things superfluous and suggested you should be able to purchase I dunno, Maggie Haberman's or David Fahrenthold's output a-la-carte and that would somehow work for them both practically and economically. I'm not the one going out on some oddly unsubstantiated limb here.