I think it's well beyond "disrespects the actual data", more into science denial territory. We have had decent data about this for a long time. It's a lot easi

I think it's well beyond "disrespects the actual data", more into science denial territory. We have had decent data about this for a long time. It's a lot easier to gather than climate data, on which the same people will profess great certainty. But it doesn't fit everyone's preferred view of things.