3 ms·
Oh really? http://pncminnesota.wordpress.com/2010/11/08/rape-survivor-devasted-by-tsa-enhanced-pat-down/ http://pncminnesota.wordpress.com/2010/11/08/rape-survi
by geuis 16y ago
Oh really? http://pncminnesota.wordpress.com/2010/11/08/rape-survivor-devasted-by-tsa-enhanced-pat-down/ http://pncminnesota.wordpress.com/2010/11/08/rape-survivor-d...
- petercooper 16y agoBeware of the big fat simile in that post. A personal impression does not an offense make. The offense of "sexual assault" requires "sexual behavior" to take place. A security pat down delivered in the appropriate, formal manner is not a display of sexual behavior though it could become such. The mere touching of "intimate" areas does not make it "sexual" per se, however.
- petercooper 16y agoAnd nor does voting this down change the letter of the law. Think about it for a minute. If any unauthorized touching of one's genitalia is "sexual assault", a surgeon performing an emergency operation could be in serious trouble. Thankfully the law in most nations distinguishes between sexual and non-sexual touching, even if the subject of the blog entry does not.