3 ms·
Well, if they're aiming to solve the last-mile problem for less advantaged people, competing on price becomes even more essential. And while the standard answer
by logicx24 8y ago
Well, if they're aiming to solve the last-mile problem for less advantaged people, competing on price becomes even more essential. And while the standard answer to this is always subsidization, I think the program needs to at the very least be sustainable from a business perspective so it doesn't become beholden to the whims of the next fiscal-hawk to take city office.
I agree with you otherwise: ride-hailing is expensive and inefficient as a last mile solution. Dockless electric scooters are a great idea, and I think if the city can do a managed rollout that doesn't frustrate residents in the area (basically, the opposite of Bird), they could be great success.
- clairity 8y agoyup, it's subsidized for low income folks. honestly, i don't think this program will last long because it's relatively expensive and can't scale efficiently. hopefully the electric scooter/bike companies figure out that a large business is literally right in front of them. it's low margin, but whoever captures it can turn around and use its scaling effects as a barrier to entry.