3 ms·
> They also discovered “significantly higher" incidences of cancer in vegetarians, as well as increased rates of anxiety disorder and depression, although they
by lawlorino 8y ago
> They also discovered “significantly higher" incidences of cancer in vegetarians, as well as increased rates of anxiety disorder and depression, although they note that this is inconsistent with other research.
Having scanned the original paper (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0088278&type=printable https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/jo...) this seems like p-value hacking. If you check table 3 they report the p-values for the chi-squared test that they did across disease categories and dietary habits, it seems they are using a threshold of p<0.05 as being significant. The problem is that they have repeated this test across ALL the different conditions without adjusting this threshold of significance, and then handpicking the ones that satisfy p<0.05. At the very least they should correct for this by using something like a Bonferroni correction (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bonferroni_correction https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bonferroni_correction).
- heyjudy 8y agoBecause this is a political agenda paper to feed news to reinforce the views of a particular demographic. "It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary[/lifestyle/world view] depends on his not understanding it." ― Upton Sinclair Any sane, rational person who can put their ego and politics aside would look at the overwhelming evidence against mass-manufactured animal ag: 0. Climate change 1. Pandemic risk 2. Antibiotics resistance 3. Pollution Somewhere down the list: animal cruelty, feeding food-insecure people and so on.