5 ms·
A talk by a climate change denial lobbying group isn't going to convince anyone.
by rhcom2 8y ago
A talk by a climate change denial lobbying group isn't going to convince anyone.
- edoo 8y agoThey are doing real science. Their models will be proven wrong or not. All the CO2 based climate models have already been proven wrong. Odd that you would be so against finding out the truth.
- rhcom2 8y agoI look forward to reading their peer reviewed work then. Otherwise I'm going to take any organization with such an obvious conflict of interest with a giant grain of salt.
- b_tterc_p 8y agoI have a model that says you’re a shill. It’d be weird if you contested that because my model is scientific.
- edoo 8y agoIf you have a falsifiable claim let's test it. Otherwise I win, you devolved to ad hominem attacks in the face of logic.
- b_tterc_p 8y agoTest that you’re a shill...? Ok, let’s test it! Let’s see your name and list of corporations / interest groups sending you money. That’s the best way to falsify this. It would be weird not to check this because it’s a scientific endeavor.
- edoo 8y agoIf you know of any groups that would actually pay me to point out fallacious logic I would love to know about them.
- b_tterc_p 8y agoOk ok. That’s enough for me. Out of character now. Serious question. Is it mind numbing or is it entertaining to vomit gross rhetoric to push out an agenda and piss people off? Genuinely curious because I feel like this would suck after a couple hours and especially on forums where you get more sincere bites.
- edoo 8y agoI am a scientist and master of logic and I find it mind numbingly entertaining to trigger episodes of cognitive dissonance in people. There is no excuse not to resolve the conflicting logic of your beliefs. You call basic logic gross rhetoric? You are exactly why I enjoy this. Even if you think you hate me you will have grown a little bit. One final dose: I'm an independent and wouldn't be caught dead voting for Trump or Hillary. Edit: Well maybe if I were dead I would vote for Hillary seeing as things go.
- b_tterc_p 8y agoWell, feel free to falsify my earlier statement by utterly doxxing yourself. Until then by the powers of logic and reasoning, for I too am a master, I’m going to reason that given your extremely one sided agenda, repetition of key phrases like “real science” and “falsified”, lack of any actual data, insistence that we need to wait years before knowing anything either way because you can’t actually disprove anything, baiting attempts and now an irrelevant political inflamement that you’re just sucking on the shaft of some corporate interest group paid to spread doubt. Cheers