4 ms·
> Because that’s not quite sustainable (hindsight is 20/20), they decided to switch all the domains they already sold for life to yearly subscriptions. What?
by RankingMember 8y ago
> Because that’s not quite sustainable (hindsight is 20/20), they decided to switch all the domains they already sold for life to yearly subscriptions.
What? At least in the U.S., if you sell something with a lifetime ownership term, you can't just renege and change the terms after the fact (well you can try, but you're asking to be sued).
- petre 8y agoIt was more along the lines of "it's yours for a one time fee, but we reserve the right to modify the registration agreement and the applicable fees at any time". In 2017 the government has decided to charge a yearly fee. It was never a lifetime subscription, but everyone assumed it was, since they weren't charged. https://web.archive.org/web/20160401102809/http://rotld.ro/portal/pages/en/1/ https://web.archive.org/web/20160401102809/http://rotld.ro/p...
- gweinberg 8y agoYou can if you're the government.
- kokokokoko 8y agoAlmost everything at this level of consumer has a TOS that allows the larger company/organization to basically change anything. And if it didn't most customers still wouldn't have the legal resources to challenge it. One of those interesting quirks of consumer free markets.
- Florin_Andrei 8y ago> most customers still wouldn't have the legal resources to challenge it The weaponization of the legal process. Those with the biggest armies win.
- benologist 8y agoFacebook liked to call it "Friendly Fraud" when they were stealing from children, the phrase suits a lot of shitty company behavior. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19002596 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19002596