4 ms·
I didn't mean to imply that it is competing with open web standards; I apologize if it came out that way. I was trying to make the case that for instance perfor
by jbergstroem 8y ago
I didn't mean to imply that it is competing with open web standards; I apologize if it came out that way. I was trying to make the case that for instance performance benefits in http3 wouldn't apply to the connection that Argo maintains to origin since it is a different protocol and what your thoughts was on this.
- jgrahamc 8y agoAh. That makes sense. Thanks for the clarification. We actually use standard protocols for the Argo Tunnel connection and we'd look at HTTP/3 as a possible mechanism for it. I agree that if there's a persistent connection the benefits of QUIC (and HTTP/2) are lessened compared to a browser doing a drive by on a web site. This is one reason the OP above is wrong about Cloudflare, HTTP/2 and Railgun.
- jbergstroem 8y agoYes, the railgun comment was why I wanted to elaborate on the subject. Thanks for your insight.