3 ms·
> No, the subscription model has been the basis for the industry for the past 100 years. And that's the reason the industry is dead -- the model is unsustainab
by notyourday 8y ago
> No, the subscription model has been the basis for the industry for the past 100 years.
And that's the reason the industry is dead -- the model is unsustainable.
Here's what I'm willing to do:
* you commit to writing one interesting piece a day. I pay you a $1 a year.
I will probably be willing to do it for a hundred authors. I figure that's like 20 cappuccinos a year. I will probably be willing to do the same for 100 video producers ( i like cooking videos, video reviews of products and photography/video videos ) and probably a few other things. But there's no way I'm paying for Philadelphia Inquirer -- Will and Trudy spew the same kind of content I can read in the Opinion section of New York Times or SFC and I am not paying for it twice.
- NeedMoreTea 8y ago* you commit to writing one interesting piece a day. I pay you a $1 a year. One a day? Nothing researched or investigative then. For $1 a year? Only the worst of the "anything for a click" would seem likely to survive that model.
- notyourday 8y agoYes. You have 300k readers? Hello $300k. You have a million readers? Hello, a million a year! Half of the United States reads you? Well, hello 160 million. You have 30 readers total? Well, you should probably get a job washing gas station floors - because your writing is just not that good.