(Thank you for outline link, its a great service!) Quoting the same article > There’s no proof that Huawei was asked to participate or turn a blind eye to the

(Thank you for outline link, its a great service!) Quoting the same article > There’s no proof that Huawei was asked to participate or turn a blind eye to the breach, but we know that there was a breach and Huawei was the key provider (The article mentions ZTE, that was also hardware provider, but did not put the blame on them?) This link also mentions that the AU HQ was bugged with microphones(the compound was build by chinese subcontractors) that implies, that if attack was real, it involved more than mere cloud service and wifi provider https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/the-african-union-headquarters-hack-and-australias-5g-network/ https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/the-african-union-headquar... But in general, the sources are not verifiable - the Le Monde itself, that seems to be the source, didnt mention huawei at all, the article quoted in parent comment mentions "australian national security source" https://www.lemonde.fr/afrique/article/2018/01/26/a-addis-abeba-le-siege-de-l-union-africaine-espionne-par-les-chinois_5247521_3212.html https://www.lemonde.fr/afrique/article/2018/01/26/a-addis-ab...